Implementing protocol-based relaparoscopy for severe complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopy has demonstrated growing applications for either primary colorectal resections or reoperations, no standardized criteria for implementing laparoscopy in revisional surgery have been reported. This study analyzes a single-center series of major complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, undergoing laparoscopic (LR), or open reoperations in compliance with a hemodynamics-based institutional management. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzes a series of consecutive patients who primarily underwent either laparoscopic left colectomy or low anterior resection in a tertiary referral center between 2016 and 2021. Major complications requiring reoperation (MCR) were managed through an interdisciplinary protocol and submitted to reoperation according to patient hemodynamics and intra-abdominal contamination. A cohort analysis primarily assessed treatment failure rates (i.e., 90-day mortality and need for further surgery), while postoperative morbidity was secondarily examined. RESULTS: Out of 1137 laparoscopic colorectal resections, 497 patients met eligibility criteria, while 45 (9.1%) developed MCRs were managed according to the standardized interdisciplinary protocol. Revisional surgery was performed through either LR (66.7%) or (33.3%). Treatment failure was 13.3% overall, including additional surgery (11.1%) and 90-day mortality (6.6%) after reoperation. In both overall and anastomotic leak-specific MCRs, relaparoscopy resulted in minimized length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, and intensity of care. CONCLUSIONS: Relaparoscopy for MCR preserves clinical benefits related to minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Further studies should investigate applicative determinants and impediments related to the center volume.

Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to assess the impact of Echelon Circular™ powered stapler (PCS) on left-sided colorectal anastomotic leaks and to compare results to conventional circular staplers (CCS). METHODS: A single center cohort study was carried out on 552 consecutive patients, who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection and anastomosis to the rectum between December 2017 and September 2022. Patients who underwent powered circular anastomosis to the rectum were matched to those who had a conventional stapled anastomosis using a propensity score matching. Main outcomes were anastomotic leak (AL) rate, anastomotic bleeding, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: After adjusting cases with propensity score matching, two new groups of patients were generated: 145 patients in the PCS and 145 in the CCS. The two groups were homogeneous with respect to demographics and comorbidities on admission. Overall, AL occurred in 21 (7.3%) patients. No significant differences were observed with respect to AL (5.5% in PCS vs 9% in CCS; p = 0.66), fistula severity (p = 0.60) or reoperation rate (p = 0.65) in the two groups in study. A higher rate of anastomotic bleeding was observed in the CCS vs PCS (5.5% vs 0.7%, p = 0.03). At univariate analysis performed after propensity score matching, stapler diameter ≥ 31mm and age ≥ 70 years were the only variable significantly associated with anastomotic leak (p = 0.001 and p = 0.031; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The powered circular stapler has no impact on AL, while it could affect bleeding rate at the anastomotic site.

Early biochemical predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a role for serum amylase and C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that pancreatic inflammation plays a pivotal role in the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy but few data are available for distal pancreatectomy (DP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of early biochemical markers on the occurrence of CR-POPF after DP. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data for 432 consecutive DP patients were reviewed. Serum amylase was evaluated on postoperative day (POD) 1, and drain fluid amylase (DFA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were evaluated on POD 2 and 3. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were performed for all biochemical markers and an area under the curve (AUC) was computed. Multivariable regression analyses to identify the factors associated with CR-POPF and severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) were performed. RESULTS: At 90 days after surgery, CR-POPF occurred in 155 (36%) patients, severe complications in 66 (15%) patients. ROC curve analyses showed that DFA on POD2 had the largest AUC (0.753, p < 0.001), followed by serum amylase on POD 1 (0.651, p < 0.001), serum CRP on POD3 (0.644, p < 0.001), and CRP change between POD 2 and POD 3 (0.644, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified male gender (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.36-3.86; p = 0.002), DFA ≥ 1500 U/L on POD2 (OR 4.63, 95% CI 2.72-7.89; p < 0.001), serum amylase ≥ 100 U/L on POD 1 (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.01-2.93; p = 0.046), and CRP increase by at least 25 mg/L on POD 3 compared to the previous day (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.11-3.21; p = 0.019) as independent predictors of CR-POPF, yielding a valid regression model (AUC 0.765, 95% CI 0.714-0.816, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative serum amylase and CRP trajectory represent useful early biochemical markers for CR-POPF in addition to DFA. Our findings suggest that these laboratory tests should be incorporated into clinical practice to aid postoperative patient and drain management.

The impact of preoperative anemia on pancreatic resection outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is a risk factor for blood transfusions and delayed postoperative recovery, but few data are available for pancreatic surgery. Aim of the study was to analyze the impact of preoperative anemia on outcomes after pancreatic resection. METHODS: Retrospective review of 1107 patients resected at San Raffaele Hospital (2015-2018). Preoperative anemia was defined as hemoglobin lower than 130 g/L for men and 120 g/L for women. Primary outcome was 90-day comprehensive complication index (CCI). Analysis was stratified according to type of surgery; proximal resections (pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy) versus distal pancreatectomy. RESULTS: In 776 proximal resection patients, preoperative anemia was associated with increased CCI (24 ± 25 vs. 19 ± 23, p = 0.018) and perioperative allogenic blood transfusions (n = 124, 46% vs. n = 129, 26%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that anemia was associated with a 7% (95%CI 0.02-0.57 p = 0.047) increase in CCI, and was an independent factor associated with perioperative blood transfusion (OR 2.762, 95%CI 1.72-4.49, p < 0.001). In 331 distal pancreatectomies, anemia was not associated to increased morbidity but only to an increased risk of perioperative blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Preoperative anemia is an independent risk factor for increased complication severity and blood transfusion in patients undergoing major pancreatic resection.